Research on the Systematic Innovation Methodology of TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving)

Research on the Systematic Innovation Methodology of TRIZ (Theory of Inventive Problem Solving)

Chapter 1: The Historical Evolution and Development Context of TRIZ Theory

TRIZ (Teoriya Resheniya Izobretatelskikh Zadatch) is a systematic innovation methodology whose development can be traced back to the mid-20th century in the former Soviet Union. This theory was officially founded by renowned Russian engineer and inventor Genrich Altshuller (1926-1998) in 1946. While serving as a patent examiner, Altshuller conducted an in-depth analysis of hundreds of thousands of invention patents worldwide, discovering universal patterns and regular characteristics present during technological innovation processes. This significant discovery laid a solid empirical foundation for constructing the TRIZ theoretical system.

In its early development phase (1946-1980), TRIZ was primarily applied within military and aerospace sectors in the former Soviet Union. Through continuous theoretical refinement and practical validation, Altshuller and his research team gradually established a complete methodological framework that includes 40 inventive principles, technical contradiction matrices, physical contradiction separation principles, among others. It is noteworthy that theoretical research during this period was limited by Cold War dynamics, mainly spreading within socialist camps.

From the late 1980s to early 1990s, with the dissolution of the Soviet Union and accelerated globalization processes, TRIZ began to spread to Western countries. From the 1990s onwards, it has been widely promoted and applied globally; professional organizations such as MATRIZ—the International TRIZ Association—were successively established while undergoing multiple iterations and upgrades in its theoretical system. Currently, TRIZ has evolved into a comprehensive innovative methodology encompassing laws governing technological system evolution, algorithms for inventive problem solving (ARIZ), standard solutions numbering up to 76 among other elements; it plays an important role across various fields including engineering technology, product R&D, management innovation etc.

Chapter 2: Core Contributors to TRIZ Theory and Their Academic Achievements

The development of TRIZ theory embodies contributions from several outstanding researchers. As its founding figurehead Genrich Altshuller not only proposed core tools like the 40 inventive principles but also constructed a complete theoretical framework over more than fifty years dedicated to refining this systematic approach towards innovation science.

Rafael Shapiro served as one of Altshuller's early collaborators who made significant contributions during its formative stages by assisting him with extensive patent analyses which helped establish basic classification methods for technical contradictions versus physical contradictions. Alexander Selyutski emerged as one prominent disciple aiding significantly in propagating education around these theories training numerous practitioners thereby promoting applications throughout various republics under USSR governance.

Boris Zlotin along with Alla Zusman successfully introduced concepts derived from this body into commercial realms establishing Ideation International where they developed structured training systems extending applicability beyond just engineering tech domains towards business innovations too! Semyon Litvin notably contributed advancements regarding ARIZE algorithm proposing conflict analysis tools enhancing systemic resolution capabilities immensely!

Yuri Salamatov's studies delved deeper into understanding evolutionary trends surrounding technological systems whilst Valentin Korosov created multi-screen thinking models providing visual aids improving operational feasibility concerning innovative procedures greatly!

Chapter 3: Core Conceptual Framework Within Theories Of Triz

3.1 Dialectical Relationship Between Technical Contradictions And Physical Contradictions... [Content continues] ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *