It’s fascinating, isn’t it, how the world of work and immigration are so intrinsically linked? The UK’s immigration system underwent some pretty significant changes at the close of 2020, and as if that wasn't enough, the pandemic threw a whole new set of challenges into the mix. Trying to untangle the impact of policy shifts from the effects of global disruption is a bit like trying to sort out tangled headphone wires – tricky business!
What’s become clear, though, is that the new Skilled Worker route seems to be bedding in rather well. I’ve heard from various sources that the streamlining and digital aspects are working smoothly, which is a real credit to the Home Office. It’s encouraging to see numbers using this route bouncing back to pre-pandemic levels, and it’s no surprise that the health sector continues to be a major player here. Interestingly, while the route has opened up to jobs at RQF levels 3-5, only a small portion of visas have gone to these newer categories so far. However, the care sector is actively tapping into it for roles like senior care workers, and it’s expected that these newer occupations will gradually gain traction as businesses become more familiar with the system.
We’ve also seen some temporary visa measures introduced for specific occupations, like HGV drivers and poultry workers. It’s a delicate balancing act, isn’t it? The government is trying to stick to the core principles of the Skilled Worker route while also being flexible enough to address immediate economic needs, many of which are pandemic-related. The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) generally supports this approach, though they’ve raised some valid points about the finer details. They’ve suggested that perhaps a more formalised, clearly defined route for roles not currently eligible might be a better long-term solution than last-minute adjustments.
Beyond the skilled worker routes, the report touches on some deeply human issues, like the tragic events in the English Channel. While the asylum system itself is outside the MAC’s direct remit, they’re keenly focused on how policy can foster better integration for asylum seekers. They’ve made a strong case for reviewing the ban on employment for asylum seekers, citing clear evidence of harm and little evidence of significant benefit. This is particularly poignant given the growing number of asylum seekers waiting over six months for an initial decision.
One area where the MAC has made a formal recommendation is the adult social care sector. They’re currently investigating the impact of ending freedom of movement on this sector and have already seen severe recruitment and retention difficulties. Their preliminary findings are so concerning that they’re recommending that care worker jobs be immediately eligible for the Health and Care Visa and placed on the Shortage Occupation List. A final report is expected in April 2022, but this interim recommendation speaks volumes about the pressures the sector is under.
And then there’s the Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) route. A review in 2021 found it to be generally effective for international businesses. The most significant proposed change? Making it a route for settlement. It’s clear that the MAC is actively engaged in advising the government on how to shape an immigration policy that truly serves the UK’s needs, all while navigating complex economic and social landscapes.
