It’s funny how certain moments in time, even those tucked away in old newsletters, can offer such a clear window into ongoing conversations. Reading through the May/June 1988 issue of The Phoenix Skeptics News, I was struck by how familiar many of the topics felt, even decades later. It’s a reminder that the quest for critical thinking and the questioning of extraordinary claims are enduring pursuits.
Back then, the Phoenix Skeptics were actively engaging with the public and the media. I recall the buzz around Nancy Reagan’s use of astrology, a story that made headlines and even landed members of the Skeptics on local radio and in the newspaper. Jim Lippard and Mike Stackpole, names that pop up frequently in this publication, were at the forefront, offering commentary and engaging in debates. It’s fascinating to see how the media landscape has changed, yet the core issues – the influence of astrology, the public’s fascination with the paranormal – remain remarkably consistent.
One of the meetings featured James Lowell from the Tucson Skeptics, who delved into the world of Mexican cancer clinics. The treatments he discussed – integrated metabolic therapy, laetrile, iridology – sound like they could be pulled from today’s alternative health discussions. It highlights a persistent challenge: how to navigate the often murky waters of unproven medical claims and protect vulnerable individuals. The group also took the opportunity to push for disclaimers on daily horoscope columns, a sensible request that, even now, feels like a battle still being fought.
Then there’s the piece by Mike Stackpole about Dr. Frank Stranges and his lecture on UFOs and a supposed meeting with a being from Venus. Stackpole’s writing has this wonderful, dry wit, describing the event with a touch of theatrical critique. He paints a vivid picture of the lecture hall, the donations collected, and the books being sold. It’s a great example of how skepticism doesn't have to be dry or academic; it can be observational, even humorous, as it dissects claims that stretch credulity.
And who could forget the Turin Shroud update? Jim Lippard’s report on the radiocarbon dating samples being taken, the potential flaws in the testing protocol, and the anticipation of results by year’s end. It’s a classic case study in scientific investigation, where even seemingly straightforward tests can have their complexities and potential pitfalls. The mention of Professor Paul Damon from the University of Arizona adds a layer of academic weight to the proceedings.
What I find most compelling about this old newsletter is the sense of community and purpose. These weren't just abstract discussions; they were active engagements with the world around them. The Phoenix Skeptics were providing a voice for critical inquiry, sharing information, and challenging the status quo. It’s a snapshot of a group dedicated to reason, and reading it feels less like looking at a historical document and more like overhearing a conversation that’s still very much alive.
